FirstCover
Go back

From Dry Spell to Windfall: The Revival of Asian Stocks on US Exchanges Along With Lawsuits?

After grinding to a near halt in 2022, Chinese companies are coming back to the US stock exchange.
Capital Markets May 03, 2024
hero-image

After grinding to a near halt in 2022, Chinese companies are coming back to the US stock exchange.

On February 8th, Hesai Technology, a Chinese auto sensor supplier, upsized its Initial Public Offering (IPO). After raising $190 million, it rose by 10.8% on its debut on Nasdaq. This is the largest deal by US-listed Chinese groups after a dry spell in the once-hot market.

In 2022, Chinese companies listed in the U.S. only raised nearly $230 million (Refinitiv data). In stark contrast with $12.85 billion in 2021, it was a big fall due to the delisting compliance risks by US regulators.

Fortunately, in December 2022, the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) retracted its previous determinations that Chinese US-listed companies were non-compliant, easing some of the immediacies of forcing Chinese companies to delist from US stock exchanges. Last week, the China Securities Regulatory Commission (CSRC) also formalized rules for Chinese-based companies wanting to file overseas IPOs. Those “seminal” decisions, coming with China’s faster-than-expected reopening, provide windfall profits for the businesses. Bob McCooey, Asia-Pacific chair at Nasdaq, commented that the listing of Hesai Group “cleared the dark clouds [that] hung over the US capital markets for Chinese companies.”

Behind the scenes, however, things look less rosy. There are still potential risks that Asian companies listed or planning to go public in the US need to manage appropriately.

Firstly, regulatory risks. Although the fear of delisting from the US audit regulator has been lifted for the time being, the PCAOB will still need to make the same choice every year going forward. At the same time, the Chinese government began to curb the impact of western auditors, urging those state-owned enterprises (SOE) to stop using Big Four Auditors, including PwC, EY, KPMG, and Deloitte, according to Bloomberg.

Secondly, geopolitical concerns. Geopolitical relationships are changing the international environment and mounting market uncertainties. Recently, because of the appearance of Chinese balloons in the US territory sky and being shot down by the US, the relationship between the US and China dropped below freezing. Consequently, the escalation of trade and political tension might trigger some retaliatory sanctions on US-listed Chinese companies. Similarly, the Taiwan issue and the Russia-Ukraine war are all risky elements for the ongoing trade war.

Last but not least, the “key man risk.” There is the possibility of missing executives of Chinese companies, according to recent news. The loss, or significant change in the key person, including the actual controller, shareholders, or senior executives, would directly affect the company’s development prospects and financial position, resulting in the usual spanking of their stock price. For example, after China Renaissance 华兴资本 confirmed its founder Bao Fan’s disappearance last week, its shares plunged more than 20%.

Exposed to the risks listed above, non-US issuers are at an increased possibility of becoming targets of securities class action lawsuits. Such companies’ officers and board directors may be the targets of financially damaging lawsuits in these increasingly litigious and volatile times. Decisions and judgments made by directors and officers are constantly scrutinized, not just by shareholders, but also by state and federal regulators and other governmental authorities. D&O insurance protects executives from personal liability and financial loss resulting from wrongful or allegedly committed acts as corporate officers. D&O insurance also covers the corporation’s balance sheet.

First Cover has tailored foreign company D&O liability insurance and can help those US-listed foreign companies to mitigate the risks. Our strength is that we represent quite a large number of APAC -based foreign issuers in the U.S. Since they are all listed either on the Nasdaq or NYSE, we are able to maximize our local resources and provide them with proper access.

Ask our expert for more risk management advice.

 


 

References:

  1. Reuters. February 17, 2023. China publishes rules to revive offshore listings
  2. Jan 09, 2023. Chinese Companies Listed on Major U.S. Stock Exchanges
  3. Richard Henderson and John Cheng. February 20, 2023. Goldman Strategists See 24% Jump in China Stocks by Year-End. Bloomberg
  4. Scott Murdoch and Harish Sridharan. Feb 3, 2023. Chinese auto sensor maker Hesai to raise up to $171 mln in U.S. IPO. Reuters.
  5. Russell Flannery. Feb 9, 2023. China’s Hesai Group Climbs In Nasdaq Debut On Autonomous Transport Hopes. Forbes.
  6. Evelyn Cheng. FEB 10, 2023. Chinese IPOs are coming back to the U.S.. CNBC.
  7. U.S. MISSION CHINA. AUGUST 27, 2022. FACT SHEET – PCAOB AGREEMENT WITH CHINA ON AUDIT INSPECTIONS AND INVESTIGATIONS
  8. KARRIE GORDON. DECEMBER 15, 2022. PCAOB Makes Historic Announcement Regarding Delisting Risk.
  9. Nicholas Megaw. FEBRUARY 9, 2023. Chinese tech group’s Nasdaq IPO signals revival for offshore listings

More posts

blog image 1 Regulatory Compliance Form 10-S Arrives, But Quarterly Disclosure Won't Disappear
The SEC’s May 5, 2026 proposal to let U.S. public companies file a new Form 10-S semiannual report in place of three Form 10-Qs is not just a filing-form update. It is a direct challenge to one of the organizing assumptions of modern U.S. securities regulation: that quarterly, standardized, SEC-reviewed interim reporting is the default architecture for public company transparency. Chairman Paul Atkins has framed the proposal as part of his “Make IPOs Great Again” agenda, arguing that the current regime is too rigid, too costly, and too poorly tailored to issuers with very different business models and investor bases. [1]
blog image 1 Capital Markets A Hawkish Hold Backed by Sticky Inflation and Resilient Demand
Executive Summary At its June 16–17, 2026 meeting, the Federal Open Market Committee left the federal funds target range unchanged at 3.50% to 3.75%, but the hold was not a neutral non-event. The statement was shortened, prior easing-oriented language was dropped, the vote was unanimous, and the updated Summary of Economic Projections shifted materially: the median policymaker now sees year-end 2026 rates at 3.8%, up from 3.4% in March, while nine of 19 policymakers project at least one hike this year and only one projects a cut. In his opening remarks, Chair Kevin Warsh emphasized that the Committee had removed forward guidance and would “deliver price stability,” while also announcing broader reviews of Fed communications, balance sheet policy, data use, productivity, and inflation frameworks. [1] The macro backdrop explains why the Fed held but also why it did not lean dovish. The latest data before the meeting showed headline CPI at 4.2% year over year in May, core CPI at 2.9%, headline PPI at 6.5%, nonfarm payrolls up 172,000, unemployment steady at 4.3%, average hourly earnings up 3.4% year over year, initial jobless claims at 229,000, and May retail sales up 0.9% month over month, with the key control-group measure up 0.7%. In other words, inflation remained too high for cuts, but the data also did not yet force a hike because some underlying inflation measures were less explosive than the headline and labor-market softening remained only gradual. Markets read the meeting as a hawkish hold: stocks fell, short-end Treasury yields jumped, the dollar strengthened, gold dropped, and rate futures repriced toward materially higher odds of a hike later this year. [2]
blog image 1 Capital Markets SPAC Market Trends 2025–2026
SPAC market trends in 2025-2026 show a disciplined recovery. This guide breaks down current IPO terms, trust structure, dilution mechanics, and what sponsors and investors need to know.